Heitzmann v. Colvin
Filing
15
Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 8/28/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 9/30/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 10/14/2014 by Judge John L. Kane on 07/14/2014. (athom, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-01116-AP
DEVIN HEITZMANN,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
1.
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
2.
For Defendant:
Sarah Van Arsdale Berry
Assistant Regional Counsel
Social Security Administration
Office of General Counsel
Region VIII
1961 Stout, Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80294
Telephone: (303) 844-1570
Facsimile: (303) 844-0770
sarah.berry@ssa.gov
STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
-1-
3.
DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.
B.
Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: April 30, 2014
C.
4.
Date Complaint Was Filed: April 18, 2014
Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: June 25, 2014
STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
To the best of his knowledge, Plaintiff states that the record is complete and accurate.
To the best of her knowledge, Defendant states that the record is complete and accurate.
5.
STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.
6.
STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR
DEFENSES
The parties state that this case does not raise unusual claims or defenses.
7.
OTHER MATTERS
The parties state that there are no other matters.
8.
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
The parties agreed to the following schedule:
A.
August 28, 2014
B.
Defendant’s Response Brief Due:
September 30, 2014
C.
9.
Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due:
Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due:
October 14, 2014
STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.
Plaintiff’s Statement:
Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
B.
Defendant’s Statement:
Defendant does not request oral argument.
-2-
10.
CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Indicate below the parties' consent choice.
A.
B.
11.
(
)
(X )
All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST
COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE
MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF
RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing
of good cause.
DATED this 14th day of July, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
S/John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
JOHN F. WALSH
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
APPROVED:
J. BENEDICT GARCÍA
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
District of Colorado
s/Diane K. Bross
Diane K. Bross, Esq
2139 Chuckwagon Rd., Ste 305
Colorado Springs, CO 80919
Telephone: 719-634-7734
Facsimile: 719-260-7736
dianebross@dianebrosslaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
s/ Sarah Van Arsdale Berry
Sarah Van Arsdale Berry
Assistant Regional Counsel
Social Security Administration
Office of General Counsel, Region VIII
1961 Stout, Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80294
Telephone: (303) 844-1570
Facsimile: (303) 844-0770
sarah.berry@ssa.gov
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?