Alba v. Colvin

Filing 24

ORDER on Consent to the Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 6/8/15. (dkals, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 14-cv-01143-REB
JOSEPHINE ALBA,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

ORDER
Blackburn, J.
Proceeding under D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(d), the parties have consented to the
jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) by filing a Consent to the
Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge [#22],1 on May 28,
2015. Thus, under D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(e), the civil action should be assigned to a
magistrate judge.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That under D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(a) and (b) this action shall be co-assigned
to a full-time magistrate judge;
2. That the case caption shall include the initials of both the district judge and the
magistrate judge to whom the case is assigned; and
3. That once a magistrate judge has been co-assigned, this court will issue an
order of reference under D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(e) assigning the action to the

1

“[#22]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.

magistrate judge currently assigned to the case.
Dated June 8, 2015, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:

2