Alba v. Colvin

Filing 24

ORDER on Consent to the Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 6/8/15. (dkals, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 14-cv-01143-REB JOSEPHINE ALBA, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER Blackburn, J. Proceeding under D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(d), the parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) by filing a Consent to the Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge [#22],1 on May 28, 2015. Thus, under D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(e), the civil action should be assigned to a magistrate judge. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That under D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(a) and (b) this action shall be co-assigned to a full-time magistrate judge; 2. That the case caption shall include the initials of both the district judge and the magistrate judge to whom the case is assigned; and 3. That once a magistrate judge has been co-assigned, this court will issue an order of reference under D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(e) assigning the action to the 1 “[#22]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. magistrate judge currently assigned to the case. Dated June 8, 2015, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?