Norton v. Leohart

Filing 27

MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10/27/14. Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Cause of Action Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) & (6) [#20] and on Plaintiff's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss [#26] are DENIED as moot. (lgale, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-01210-KLM JASON THOMAS NORTON, Plaintiff, v. MICHELE LEOHART, Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Cause of Action Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) & (6) [#20] (“Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss”) and on Plaintiff’s Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss [#26] (“Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss”). Plaintiff proceeds in this matter as an incarcerated pro se litigant. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), the plaintiff may dismiss a case without a Court order by filing “a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment . . . .” Defendant has not filed either an answer or a motion for summary judgment, and the Court accepts Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss as a notice of dismissal. Therefore, the Clerk of Court may dismiss this case without prejudice without entry of a Court order, and shall do so. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [#20] and Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss [#26] are DENIED as moot. Dated: October 27, 2014

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?