Hamilton v. Farmers Insurance Group et al
MINUTE ORDER denying Without Prejudice 29 Plaintiffs motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 11/17/2014.(evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-01211-WJM-MJW
PRISCILLA P. HAMILTON,
FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP and
BARTHOLOMEW O. BAAH,
Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
Plaintiff has moved for leave to file a second amended complaint. (Docket No.
29.) The purpose of the amendment is to identify the correct insurance companies in
this car-accident case.
As set forth in this Court’s October 29, 2014, Report & Recommendation (Docket
No. 28), Plaintiff cannot state a claim directly against Defendant Baah’s insurers; she
has a claim only against Defendant Baah. (See Docket No. 28, p.3 & n.1.) The
proposed amendment is therefore futile.
That said, District Judge William J. Martinez has not yet adopted the Report &
Recommendation. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint (Docket No.
29) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and
If Judge Martinez overrules the Report & Recommendation, finding that
Plaintiff can properly state a claim against Defendant Baah’s insurer, the
Court will entertain a renewed motion for leave to file a second amended
Date: November 17, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?