Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. CollegeAmerica Denver, Inc.

Filing 82

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 70 Plaintiff EEOC's Motion to Compel, as set forth in the order, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 12/17/2015.(emill)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-01232-LTB-MJW EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff(s), v. COLLEGEAMERICA DENVER, INC., n/k/a CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION, INC., d/b/a COLLEGEAMERICA, Defendant(s). ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe On December 3, 2015, this court entered an Order Regarding Plaintiff EEOC’s Motion to Compel (docket no. 70). See Order (docket no. 77). In the Order (docket no. 77), this court deferred ruling on part of the subject motion (docket no. 70) pertaining to Plaintiff EEOC’s Request for Production No. 5 and ordered Defendant to file, in camera, and under restricted access Level 2, the personnel files of Eric Juhlin and Kevin [Kenneth] Barnhart by December 11, 2015. Defendant filed the personnel files under restricted access Level 2 for Eric Juhlin and Kevin [Kenneth] Barnhart on December 10, 2015. See personnel files (docket no. 80) The court has now reviewed, in camera, the personnel files submitted by Defendant and the court finds: 1. That bates stamped numbers CEHE 00645 through CEHE 00743, 2 inclusive, are the personnel file for Kevin [Kenneth] Barnhart that was submitted by the Defendant; 2. That bates stamped numbers CEHE 00744 through CEHE 00753, inclusive, are the personnel file for Eric Juhlin that was submitted by the Defendant; 3. That as to the personnel file for Kenneth E. Barnhart, only bates stamped pages CEHE 00645 Separation/Exit Interview document and CEHE 00672 Information Letter are relevant, and the evidentiary objections by Defendant to these two bates stamped pages are overruled. As to the remainder of the bates stamped numbers for the personnel file for Mr. Barnhart, the Defendant’s evidentiary objections are sustained; 4. That the personnel file for Kenneth E. Barnhart that was submitted to this court does not contain a “severance agreement;” and 5. That as to the entire personnel file for Eric Juhlin that was submitted to this court, none of the information is relevant, and the evidentiary objections by Defendant are sustained. There are no documents relating to Debbi Potts or any complaint against Mr. Juhlin for retaliation contained the personnel file for Eric Juhlin that was submitted to this court. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this Court’s Order Regarding Plaintiff EEOC’s Motion to Compel (docket no. 70) [docket no. 77] is AMENDED as follows: 1. That as to Plaintiff’s RFP No. 5, which this court had DEFERRED ruling until after, in camera, review of the personnel files for Kenneth E. Barnhart 3 and Eric Juhlin (docket no. 77), for Kenneth E. Barnhart), the Plaintiff EEOC’s Motion to Compel (docket no. 70) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IT PART. It is GRANTED as to only bates stamped pages CEHE 00645 Separation/Exit Interview document and CEHE 00672 Information Letter in the personnel file for Kenneth E. Barnhart. The remainder of the information requested in Plaintiff’s RFP No. 5 is DENIED; 2. That Defendant shall provide Plaintiff EEOC with a copy of Kenneth E. Barnhart bates stamped pages CEHE 00645 Separation/Exit Interview document and CEHE 00672 Information Letter on or before January 4, 2016; and 3. That each party shall pay their own attorney fees and costs for this motion. Done this 17th day of December, 2015. s/ Michael J. Watanabe MICHAEL J. WATANABE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?