Marquez v. Line et al
Filing
30
ORDER denying without prejudice 26 Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis re 25 Notice of Appeal. A new motion may be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The 27 Application for Certificate of Appealability is denied. By Judge William J. Martinez on 1/13/2015.(alowe)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge William J. Martínez
Civil Case No. 14-cv-01313-WJM
ANTHONY MARQUEZ,
Applicant,
v.
RICK LINE, Warden, Arkansas Valley Corr. Fac., and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO,
Respondents.
ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED ON APPEAL
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915 AND FED. R. APP. P. 24
Martínez, Judge
Applicant has filed pro se a notice of appeal (ECF No. 25), a motion to proceed
in forma pauperis on appeal (ECF No. 26), and an application f or a certificate of
appealability (ECF No. 27). The court has examined the motion and the file and finds
that the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is deficient for the following reasons:
is missing affidavit
affidavit is incomplete
affidavit is not notarized or is not properly notarized
affidavit is missing required financial information
is missing certified copy of prisoner’s trust fund statement for the 6 month
period immediately preceding this filing
is missing certificate showing current balance in prison account
is missing an original signature by the prisoner
X
is not on proper form (must use the court’s current form)
other
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on
appeal (ECF No. 26) is denied without prejudice because the motion is deficient. A
new motion may be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It
is
FURTHER ORDERED that the application for certificate of appealability (ECF
No. 27) is denied.
Dated this 13th day of January, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
William J. Martínez
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?