Conkleton v. Raemisch et al

Filing 16

ORDER REINSTATING CASE. This civil action is reinstated pursuant to the 15 mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit filed on March 20, 2015. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 03/25/2015. (athom, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-01345-LTB JAMES K. CONKLETON, Plaintiff, v. RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections (CDOC), in his official capacity, BRANDON SHAFFER, Chairman, Colorado Board of Parole, in his official capacity, ALFREDO PENA, Member, Colorado Board of Parole, in his official capacity, DENISE BALAZIC, Member, Colorado Board of Parole, in her official capacity, BART COX, Treatment Provider for the CDOC Sex Offender Treatment and Management Program (SOTMP), in his official capacity, MICHAEL FLOYD, Contract Polygrapher of Amich & Jenks, Inc., in his official capacity, ANN NEWMAN, Treatment Provider for the CDOC SOTMP, in her official capacity, SAMUEL DUNLAP, Treatment Provider for the CDOC SOTMP, in his official capacity, LEONARD WOODSON, Treatment Provider for the CDOC SOTMP, in his official capacity, JEFF JENKS, Contract Polygrapher/Sex Offender Management Board (SOMB) member, in his official capacity, COLTON McNUTT, Treatment Provider for the CDOC SOTMP, in his official capacity, and SOTMP TREATMENT TEAM, in its official capacity, Defendants. ORDER REINSTATING CASE Pursuant to the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit filed on March 20, 2015, this civil action will be reinstated. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this civil action is reinstated pursuant to the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit filed on March 20, 2015. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the case shall be reassigned to the pro se docket. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 25th day of March , 2015. BY THE COURT: s/Lewis T. Babcock LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?