Olson et al v. City of Aurora, Colorado et al
Filing
45
PROCEDURAL ORDER NUMBER ONE Counsel will meet and confer as required by Rule 26(f)(2) within 30 days from the date of this order. Lead counsel shall attend the conference in person. The disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1)(A) shall be made wit hin 14 days after that conference. The proposed discovery plan will be in the form of the Scheduling Order which will be submitted to chambers in paper form 10 days before the date of the Scheduling Conference. Counsel for the plaintiffs will te lephone chambers within 10 days after the disclosures to set a date and time for a Scheduling Conference pursuant to Rule 16. The instructions for preparation of the Scheduling Order and the form of that order are found at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/judges/judges.aspx, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 8/14/15. (ktera)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Civil Action No. 14-cv-01362-RPM
TIMOTHY OLSON;
MARY ANN LOMBARDI;
CRYSTAL DEGUZMAN;
MICHAEL HANCE;
ENRIQUE NUNEZ;
DENISE BURKE;
MARCI STRANDBERG;
IAN STRANDBERG, a minor by & through his natural mother & next friend, Marci Strandberg;
CHLOE STRANDBERG, a minor by & through her natural mother & next friend, Marci Strandberg;
QUINTEN TWEED;
SARA LOMBARD;
TONY TWEED, a minor by & through his natural mother & next friend, Sara Lombard;
TYSON TWEED, a minor by & through his natural mother & next friend, Sara Lombard;
NESIAH TWEED, a minor by & through her natural mother & next friend, Sara Lombard,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF AURORA, COLORADO, a municipality;
DANIEL J. OATES, Aurora Police Chief, in his official capacity;
CHRISTEN LERTCH, in his official and individual capacities;
KRISTOPHER MCDOWELL, in his official and individual capacities;
LUKE J. BARKER, in his official and individual capacities;
RICHARD RAY, in his official and individual capacities;
BRANDT A. SMITH, in his official and individual capacities;
MICHAEL DAVID PRINCE, in his official and individual capacities; and
A. TODD CHANOS, in his official and individual capacities,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
PROCEDURAL ORDER NUMBER ONE
_____________________________________________________________________
Seeing that this civil action is now at issue, it is
ORDERED, that counsel will meet and confer as required by Rule 26(f)(2) within 30 days
from the date of this order. Lead counsel shall attend the conference in person. The
disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1)(A) shall be made within 14 days after that conference.
The proposed discovery plan will be in the form of the Scheduling Order which will be submitted
to chambers in paper form 10 days before the date of the Scheduling Conference.
The disclosures must include copies of documents that are discoverable under Rule
26(b)(1) with the exception of electronically stored information which will be described by
category and location.
In complex cases, the parties may limit disclosures to the core documents and provide
for additional disclosures in the Scheduling Order.
Counsel for the plaintiff(s) will telephone chambers within 10 days after the disclosures to
set a date and time for a Scheduling Conference pursuant to Rule 16.
Lead counsel for the parties will attend the Scheduling Conference and should be
prepared to discuss the essential facts giving rise to the dispute and the discovery plan. NO
FORMAL DISCOVERY WILL BE INITIATED BEFORE THE SCHEDULING ORDER IS
ENTERED. Because candor in response to the Court’s questions is expected, attendance at
the conference is limited to the attorneys.
The form of scheduling order to be prepared for this Court is different from the form
included in the Local Rules and is designed to facilitate the Court’s early involvement in the
preparation for adjudication of the merits of this lawsuit.
The instructions for preparation of the Scheduling Order and the form of that order are
found at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/judges/judges.aspx.
DATED:
August 14th, 2015
BY THE COURT:
s/Richard P. Matsch
__________________________
Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?