Stead v. Menduno
Filing
46
COURTROOM MINUTES for Motion Hearing held on 12/4/2014 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Respondent's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses 36 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. FTR: KMT C201. (sgrim)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No:
Courtroom Deputy:
14-cv-01400-PAB-KMT
Sabrina Grimm
Date: December 4, 2014
FTR: Courtroom C-201
Parties:
Counsel:
IN RE THE APPLICATION OF ANTHONY LEIGH
STEAD,
Miranda Rogers
John Cadkin
Plaintiff,
v.
DAVINA MENDUNO,
Andrew Helm
Nathaniel Barker
Defendant.
COURTROOM MINUTES
MOTION HEARING
1:36 p.m.
Court in session.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
Mr. Helm informs the Court that the requests for admission in dispute have been resolved.
Discussion and argument regarding Petitioner’s financial situation, affirmative defense of grave
risk based on financial circumstances, Judge Brimmer’s Order [43], identification of employers,
Mr. Stead’s deposition testimony and his employment log.
Court finds Interrogatory No. 5 is irrelevant.
ORDERED: Respondent’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses [36] is GRANTED IN
PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is GRANTED as to
Interrogatory No. 8 and Request for Production No. 1. Petitioner shall
produce his signed supplemental response to Interrogatory No. 8 and
responsive documents relied on to comply with Interrogatory No. 8, as
discussed, on or before December 12, 2014. To the extent the Petitioner relies
upon a Day Planner or other calendar, that shall not be produced. The
motion is DENIED in all other respects.
2:08 p.m.
Court in recess.
Hearing concluded.
Total in-court time 00:32
*To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?