Kunselman et al v. Wells Fargo Bank et al

Filing 67

ORDER granting 63 Motion to Dismiss Party. Defendant Wells Fargo Bank d/b/a Americas Servicing Company only are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear his, her, or its own costs. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 06/09/2015. (athom, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Raymond P. Moore
Civil Action No. 14-cv-01417-RM-KMT
LUKE KUNSELMAN, and
EMILY KUNSELMAN,
Plaintiffs,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK d/b/a AMERICAS
SERVICING COMPANY, and
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO
DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK d/b/a AMERICAS SERVICING COMPANY
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Defendant
Wells Fargo Bank with Prejudice (“Motion”). (ECF No. 63.) Upon consideration of the Motion,
the file, and the applicable rules, and being otherwise fully advised, it is
ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion (ECF No. 63) is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiffs’
claims and complaint as against Defendant Wells Fargo Bank d/b/a Americas Servicing
Company only are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear his, her,
or its own costs. Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. remains in the case; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Wells Fargo Bank d/b/a Americas Servicing
Company’s name shall be removed from the caption in all future filings with the Court.
DATED this 9th day of June, 2015.
BY THE COURT:

____________________________________
RAYMOND P. MOORE
United States District Judge

2