Adams et al v. Womble et al

Filing 39

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/18/14 re: Parties' Joint Motion for Stay Pending Resolution of Motions to Dismiss Related to Governmental Immunity Act Notice Provisions 37 . The Motion to Stay is GRANTED. The Scheduling Co nference set for October 10, 2014, is VACATED to be reset by further order of the court. The parties shall file a status report within ten days after any ruling on Memorial Hospital's Motion to Dismiss 22 and/or Jeffrey Womble's Motion to Dismiss 33 . (bsimm, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 14-cv-01431-RM-BNB JULIE ADAMS, and MICHAEL ADAMS, Plaintiffs, v. JEFFREY WOMBLE, M.D., and THE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter arises on the Parties’ Joint Motion for Stay Pending Resolution of Motions to Dismiss Related to Governmental Immunity Act Notice Provisions [Doc. # 37, filed 9/18/2014] (the “Motion to Stay”). Good cause has been shown for the relief requested. IT IS ORDERED: (1) The Motion to Stay [Doc. # 37] is GRANTED. Disclosure requirements are abated and no discovery is allowed pending further order of the court. (2) The Scheduling Conference set for October 10, 2014, is VACATED to be reset by further order of the court. (2) The parties shall file a status report within ten days after any ruling on Memorial Hospital’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 22] and/or Jeffrey Womble’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 33] advising me of the nature of the ruling and, if appropriate, requesting that a scheduling conference be set. Dated September 18, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?