Kole v. Lynch et al

Filing 71

MINUTE ORDER; 69 Plaintiffs [Supplemental] Request forAdditional Production of Documents in the Above[-]Captioned Case FromDefendants is STRICKEN from the record, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/14/16.(morti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-01435-WJM-KLM
BENJAMIN FRANCIS KOLE,
Plaintiff,
v.
SHERIFF JUSTIN SMITH, in his individual and official capacities,
CAPTAIN TIMOTHY PALMER, in his individual and official capacities,
LIEUTENANT STACEY SHAFFER, in her individual and official capacities,
DEPUTY CASSONDRA WINDWALKER, in her individual capacity,
LIEUTENANT MICHAEL ESTER, in his individual and official capacities,
CORPORAL BRYCE GRIFFIN, in his individual and official capacities,
PROGRAMS VOLUNTEER COORDINATOR LISA SCHLUETER, in her individual and
official capacities, and
SERGEANT AARON SMOYER, in his individual and official capacities,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s [Supplemental] Request for
Additional Production of Documents in the Above[-]Captioned Case From
Defendants [#69]1, which was docketed as a motion, (the “Motion”). This is a typed
version of a document [#65] the Court already addressed and does not request any relief
from the Court.
As the Court explained in its January 8, 2016 Minute Order [#67]:
The Motion appears to be a supplemental discovery request directed to
Defendants and does not request any relief from the Court. Accordingly, to
the extent the Court must rule on the Motion because it was docketed as a
motion, the Court will deny it. The Court further notes that discovery

1

“[#69]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to
a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I
use this convention throughout this Minute Order.

1

requests should be exchanged by the parties and should not be filed with the
Court.
Minute Order [#67] at 1. Because the Motion is duplicative of a document previously
addressed by the Court,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#69] is STRICKEN from the record. The
Court will not entertain duplicate filings of the same document, even if one version is
handwritten and the other is typed.
Dated: January 14, 2016

2