Purdy v. Colvin

Filing 22

ORDER granting 21 Motion to Remand. The Clerk will enter a judgment in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, consistent with the United States Supreme Courts decision in Shalala v. Shaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296-302 (1993), by Judge John L. Kane on 12/12/14. (athom, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-01437-AP
CHARLES PURDY,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

ORDER

Upon review of Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Remand for Further Proceedings filed
on December 12, 2014,
IT IS ORDERED that said motion is granted. Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C.
§ 405(g), the Court orders that Defendant will remand the matter to an administrative law judge
(ALJ) for further administrative proceedings on Plaintiff’s application for disability insurance
benefits and supplemental security income, including a de novo hearing and a new decision.
Upon remand, the agency will direct the ALJ to: (1) further evaluate the medical and other
opinions of record, explaining the reasons for the weight given to these opinions; (2) further
consider Plaintiff’s subjective complaints; (3) further evaluate Plaintiff’s residual functional
capacity; and (4) if warranted by the expanded record, obtain supplemental evidence from a
vocational expert at step five of the sequential evaluation process.

Further, the Clerk will enter a judgment in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, consistent
with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Shalala v. Shaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296-302
(1993).

DATED this 12th day of December, 2014.

__s/John L. Kane_________
JOHN L. KANE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE