Brown v. City of Colorado Springs, The et al
Filing
39
ORDER Granting 38 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Dispositive Motion Deadline December 18, 2015. Any rebuttal opinions will be exchanged on or before November 30, 2015, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 11/16/15. (ktera)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Civil Action No. 14-cv-01471-RPM
RONALD DWAYNE BROWN,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS,
PETER CAREY, Chief of Police, Colorado Springs Police Department, in his official capacity,
VINCE NISKI, Deputy Chief of Police, Colorado Springs Police Department, individually and in
his official capacity,
Lt. SALVATORE FIORILLO III, Unite Commander, Tactical Enforcement Unit (Swat Team),
Colorado Springs Police Department, individually and in his official capacity,
Sgt. RONALD SHEPPARD, Colorado Springs Police Department, individually,
Sgt. CHRIS ARSENEAU, Colorado Springs Police Department, individually,
Officer DAN CARTER, Colorado Springs Police Department, individually,
Officer WILLIAM P. BETTS, Colorado Springs Police Department, individually,
Officer ROBIN McPIKE, Colorado Springs Police Department, individually,
Officer SHAWN MAHON, Colorado Springs Police Department, individually,
Officer MARCUS VAN OONYEN, Colorado Springs Police Department, individually,
Defendants.
____________________________________________________________________________
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
____________________________________________________________________________
Upon review of Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order [Doc. 38], it is
ORDERED that the Scheduling Order is amended as follows:
Part 7(c): Dispositive Motion Deadline: December 18, 2015.
Part 7(d)(5): Any rebuttal opinions will be exchanged on or before November
30, 2015.
DATED: November 16th, 2015
BY THE COURT:
s/Richard P. Matsch
__________________________
Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?