Brown v. City of Colorado Springs, The et al

Filing 39

ORDER Granting 38 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Dispositive Motion Deadline December 18, 2015. Any rebuttal opinions will be exchanged on or before November 30, 2015, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 11/16/15. (ktera)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Civil Action No. 14-cv-01471-RPM RONALD DWAYNE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, PETER CAREY, Chief of Police, Colorado Springs Police Department, in his official capacity, VINCE NISKI, Deputy Chief of Police, Colorado Springs Police Department, individually and in his official capacity, Lt. SALVATORE FIORILLO III, Unite Commander, Tactical Enforcement Unit (Swat Team), Colorado Springs Police Department, individually and in his official capacity, Sgt. RONALD SHEPPARD, Colorado Springs Police Department, individually, Sgt. CHRIS ARSENEAU, Colorado Springs Police Department, individually, Officer DAN CARTER, Colorado Springs Police Department, individually, Officer WILLIAM P. BETTS, Colorado Springs Police Department, individually, Officer ROBIN McPIKE, Colorado Springs Police Department, individually, Officer SHAWN MAHON, Colorado Springs Police Department, individually, Officer MARCUS VAN OONYEN, Colorado Springs Police Department, individually, Defendants. ____________________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER ____________________________________________________________________________ Upon review of Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order [Doc. 38], it is ORDERED that the Scheduling Order is amended as follows: Part 7(c): Dispositive Motion Deadline: December 18, 2015. Part 7(d)(5): Any rebuttal opinions will be exchanged on or before November 30, 2015. DATED: November 16th, 2015 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch __________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?