Romero v. Allstate Fire & Casualty Insurance Company

Filing 50

ORDER denying 47 Motion to Strike as duplicative; denying 48 Motion to Strike for failure to comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(a). Motion may be refiled on or before 8/17/15; any response is due on or before 8/31/15. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 8/13/15. (nywlc1)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-01522-NYW
BERTHA N. ROMERO,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALLSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang
This civil action comes before the court on Defendant’s two Motions to Strike Plaintiff’s
Expert Disclosures. [#47, #48, filed August 10, 2015].
The Motions are identical and ask the court to strike Plaintiff’s expert disclosures for
failure to properly designate and disclose seven treating providers and for failure to comply with
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C). Compare [#47] with [#48]. Neither of the Motions contains a
certificate of conferral as required by D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(a). Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Expert Disclosures [#47] is DENIED as duplicative of [#48];
2. The Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Expert Disclosures [#48] is DENIED for failure to comply
with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(a) WITH LEAVE TO REFILE on or before August 17, 2015;
and
3. Any Response is due on or before August 31, 2015.

DATED: August 13, 2015