Ellis v. Raemisch et al

Filing 48

ORDER CLARIFYING JUDGMENT. it is now ORDERED that the 18 Judgment is to be amended to provide that the State of Colorado must re-try Mark Stephen Ellis on the charges upon which he was convicted within 90 days from the entry of the amended judgment, failing in which he shall be released from custody on those convictions, which have been vacated by this Court, and upon which no further proceedings shall be pursued, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/25/2015.(evana, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Civil Action No. 14-cv-01565-RPM MARK STEPHEN ELLIS, Petitioner, v. RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, and CYNTHIA COFFMAN, Attorney General, State of Colorado, Respondents. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER CLARIFYING JUDGMENT _____________________________________________________________________ In the Judgment entered on December 12, 2014, this Court ordered that “The State of Colorado shall initiate new criminal proceedings against Mark Stephen Ellis within 90 days, failing in which he shall be released from custody.” The Respondents filed a Motion to Clarify [Doc. 31] and the Petitioner also filed a Motion to Clarify Order and Judgment [Doc. 35]. The parties have correctly shown an ambiguity in the judgment. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED that the judgment is to be amended to provide that the State of Colorado must re-try Mark Stephen Ellis on the charges upon which he was convicted within 90 days from the entry of the amended judgment, failing in which he shall be released from custody on those convictions, which have been vacated by this Court, and upon which no further proceedings shall be pursued. DATED: February 25th, 2015 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch ________________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?