Let's Go Aero, Inc. v. Cequent Performance Products, Inc.
Filing
33
MINUTE ORDER granting 30 Unopposed Motion to Stay Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/25/2014. Motion Hearing set for 9/30/2014 and Scheduling Conference set for 10/16/2014 are VACATED. The parties shall complete and file the consent form on or before 10/08/2014. (slibi, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-01600-MEH
LET'S GO AERO, INC., a Colorado corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
CEQUENT PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS, INC., a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Cequent
Towing Products, Inc.,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on September 25, 2014.
Defendant Cequent’s renewed and partially unopposed Motion to Stay Discovery and Pretrial
Scheduling [filed September 17, 2014; docket #30] is granted as follows. The proceedings of this
case are stayed temporarily pending resolution of the Defendant’s pending motion to compel
arbitration. Pursuant to D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1(d), the Plaintiff shall file a response to the motion to
compel arbitration on or before October 8, 2014 and the Defendant may file a reply in support of the
motion within fourteen (14) days after the response is served.
In light of this order, the motion hearing set for September 30, 2014 is vacated. In addition,
the Court will vacate the Scheduling Conference currently set for October 16, 2014 and will
reschedule the conference, if necessary, upon resolution of the motion to compel.
Finally, the Court notes that the parties have not filed a fully executed consent form required
by the Pilot Program for Direct Assignment of Civil Cases to Full Time Magistrate Judges (see
docket #5). The parties shall complete and file the consent form on or before October 8, 2014.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?