Case v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
ORDER ADOPTING 29 RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Defendant's 23 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and Plaintiff's 2 Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to timely exhaust his administrative remedies. By Judge William J. Martinez on 2/20/2015. (alowe)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge William J. Martínez
Civil Action No. 14-cv-1649-WJM-NYW
LONNIE DAVID CASE,
THE UNITED STATES,
ORDER ADOPTING FEBRUARY 2, 2015 RECOMMENDATION OF
MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
This matter is before the Court on the February 2, 2015 Recommendation of
United States Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland (the “Recommendation”) (ECF No. 29)
that the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 23) be granted. The Recommendation
is incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were due
within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. (ECF No.
29, at 6 n.3.) Despite this advisement, no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s
Recommendation have to date been received.
The Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s analysis was thorough and
sound, and that there is no clear error on the face of the record. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b) advisory committee’s note (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only
satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the
recommendation.”); see also Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) (“In
the absence of timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate’s report under
any standard it deems appropriate.”).
In accordance with the foregoing, the Court ORDERS as follows:
The Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (ECF No. 29) is ADOPTED in its
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 23) is GRANTED; and
Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (ECF No. 12) is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE for failure to timely exhaust his administrative remedies.
Dated this 20th day of February, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
William J. Martínez
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?