El Toledo, LLC v. Sequoia Insurance Company
Filing
21
MINUTE ORDER denying 19 Motion for Protective Order without prejudice, and the proposed Protective Order is REFUSED. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 1/8/2015.(tscha, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No. 14–cv–01696–RM–KMT
EL TOLEDO, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company,
Plaintiff,
v.
SEQUOIA INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation,
Defendant.
MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA
This matter is before the court on the Stiuplated Motion for Entry of Protective Order. (Doc. No.
19, filed Dc. 19, 2014.) The Motion is DENIED and the proposed Protective Order is
REFUSED. The parties are granted leave to submit a motion for protective order and revised
form of protective order consistent with the comments contained here.
Gillard v. Boulder Valley School District, 196 F.R.D. 382 (D. Colo. 2000), set out certain
requirements for the issuance of a blanket protective order such as the one sought here. Among
other things, any information designated by a party as confidential must first be reviewed by a
lawyer who will certify that the designation as confidential is Abased on a good faith belief that
[the information] is confidential or otherwise entitled to protection.@ Gillard, 196 F.R.D. at 386.
The proposed Protective Order does not comply with the requirements established in Gillard.
Therefore, it is ORDERED that the Motion for Protective Order (Doc. No. 19) is DENIED
without prejudice, and the proposed Protective Order is REFUSED.
Dated: January 8, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?