El Toledo, LLC v. Sequoia Insurance Company

Filing 21

MINUTE ORDER denying 19 Motion for Protective Order without prejudice, and the proposed Protective Order is REFUSED. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 1/8/2015.(tscha, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No. 14–cv–01696–RM–KMT EL TOLEDO, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. SEQUOIA INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, Defendant. MINUTE ORDER ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA This matter is before the court on the Stiuplated Motion for Entry of Protective Order. (Doc. No. 19, filed Dc. 19, 2014.) The Motion is DENIED and the proposed Protective Order is REFUSED. The parties are granted leave to submit a motion for protective order and revised form of protective order consistent with the comments contained here. Gillard v. Boulder Valley School District, 196 F.R.D. 382 (D. Colo. 2000), set out certain requirements for the issuance of a blanket protective order such as the one sought here. Among other things, any information designated by a party as confidential must first be reviewed by a lawyer who will certify that the designation as confidential is Abased on a good faith belief that [the information] is confidential or otherwise entitled to protection.@ Gillard, 196 F.R.D. at 386. The proposed Protective Order does not comply with the requirements established in Gillard. Therefore, it is ORDERED that the Motion for Protective Order (Doc. No. 19) is DENIED without prejudice, and the proposed Protective Order is REFUSED. Dated: January 8, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?