Schniedwind v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Filing
80
ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's Objections to Defendant's Counter-Designations of Deposition Testimony of American Family Adjuster Suzanna Wade re: 72 . Signed by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 01/13/16. (jhawk, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Philip A. Brimmer
Civil Action No. 14-cv-01734-PAB-NYW
PATRICIA SCHNIEDWIND,
Plaintiff,
v.
AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant.
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT’S
COUNTER-DESIGNATIONS OF DEPOSITION TESTIMONY OF AMERICAN
FAMILY ADJUSTER SUZANNA WADE
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Objections to Defendant’s
Counter-Designations of Deposition Testimony of American Family Mutual Adjuster
Suzanna Wade [Docket No. 72]. The Court rules as follows on plaintiff’s objections:
Item
#
1
Testimony
Objection
5:20-6:5
No objection
2
10:4-8
No objection
3
11:4-13:10
No objection
4
14:4-14
No objection
Ruling
5
16:21-19:19
6
17:5-12
7
18:15-19:7
8
Cumulative (contains portions
of testimony previously
designated by Plaintiff: 16:1918:14), relevance, and
speculation as to remaining
portions
Cumulative, designated
portions are contained in
Item # 6, see objections to
Item #5
See Objection to Item #5
Overruled.
21:12-22:20
Cumulative (contained in
testimony previously
designated by Plaintiff); no
objection to 22:16-20
Overruled.
9
23:11-13
No objection
10
24:5-7
11
24:23-25:1
Cumulative (contained in
testimony previously
designated by Plaintiff: 24:513)
No objection
12
25:6-11
No objection
13
27:3-18
No objection
14
27:20-28:5
No objection
15
28:8-10
No objection
16
18:18-23
[28:18-23]
17
31:14-33:2
Incomplete: the witness’ full
answer was cut-off and
continues through to page
29:3; no objection if 28:24-29:3
is included
Relevance, hearsay,
foundation, speculation
18
35:4-19
No objection
19
47:2-8
Relevance, speculation
2
Overruled.
Overruled.
Sustained.
If 28:24 to 29:3 is not included,
sustained as incomplete and
misleading.
Overruled.
Overruled.
20
43:10-14
21
58:13-17
Relevance, foundation,
speculation
Foundation; hearsay
Sustained. No foundation.
Sustained.
DATED January 13, 2016.
BY THE COURT:
s/Philip A. Brimmer
PHILIP A. BRIMMER
United States District Judge
3
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
