Snyder et al v. Acord Corporation et al
ORDER ON MOTION TO STRIKE. Defendant's 491 Motion to Strike is GRANTED; Defendant's 492 Motion for Extension of Time is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike and its accompanying documents (Docs. 481 , 485-488) are STRICKEN, by Judge John L. Kane on 3/2/2016.(agarc, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-01736-JLK
DALE SNYDER, et al.,
ACORD CORPORATION, et al.,
ORDER ON MOTION TO STRIKE
Before me are Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief from Final
Judgment (Doc. 491) and Defendants’ Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond (Doc. 492).
I agree with Defendants that Plaintiff’s Motion (Doc. 481), which together with its various
appendices and exhibits (see Docs. 485 & 486) totals over 1,000 pages, is absurdly prolix, and
accordingly Defendants’ Motion to Strike (Doc. 491) is GRANTED and Defendants’ Motion for
an Extension of Time (Doc. 492) is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike and its
accompanying documents (Docs. 481, 485-488) are STRICKEN. Because Plaintiffs’ counsel
has ignored my repeated suggestion that briefs in this matter should be kept to a reasonable
length, see, e.g., Doc. 432 at 5:5-10, should Plaintiffs choose to re-file their motion to alter or
amend the judgment, it is ORDERED that their brief in support together with any supplemental
documents shall not exceed TEN PAGES in length, with TEN PAGES for Defendants in
response and FIVE PAGES for any reply.
Dated: March 2, 2016
s/ John L. Kane
Senior U.S. District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?