Enger Family Partnership, LLLP et al v. EMCASCO Insurance Company

Filing 101

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The 100 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss with prejudice is granted. All other pending motions, including those docketed as [# 44 & # 92 ] and the pending objection [# 98 ] are denied as moot. This action is dismissed with prejudice with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and cots. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 4/21/2015. (alowe) Modified filed date on 4/22/2015 (alowe).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 14-cv-01748-REB-NYW ENGER ENTERPRISES, LLC, f/k/a ENGER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LLLP, Plaintiff, v. EMCASCO INSURANCE COMPANY, an Iowa corporation, Defendant. ORDER OF DISMISSAL Blackburn, J. The matter is before me on the Stipulated Motion To Dismiss with Prejudice [#100]1 filed April 21, 2015. After careful review of the motion and the file, I conclude that the motion should be granted. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Stipulated Motion To Dismiss with Prejudice, is granted; 2. That all other pending motions, including those docketed as [#44 & #92], and the pending objection [#98] are denied as moot; 3. That all pretrial deadlines are vacated; 4. That the motion hearing set for May 7, 2015, is vacated; 5. That the combined Final Pretrial Conference/Trial Preparation Conference set for June 26, 2015, is vacated; 6. That the jury trial set to commence July 13, 2015, is vacated; and 1 “[#100]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. 6. That this action is dismissed with prejudice with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. Dated April 21, 2015, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?