Enger Family Partnership, LLLP et al v. EMCASCO Insurance Company
Filing
101
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The 100 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss with prejudice is granted. All other pending motions, including those docketed as [# 44 & # 92 ] and the pending objection [# 98 ] are denied as moot. This action is dismissed with prejudice with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and cots. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 4/21/2015. (alowe) Modified filed date on 4/22/2015 (alowe).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 14-cv-01748-REB-NYW
ENGER ENTERPRISES, LLC, f/k/a ENGER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LLLP,
Plaintiff,
v.
EMCASCO INSURANCE COMPANY, an Iowa corporation,
Defendant.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Blackburn, J.
The matter is before me on the Stipulated Motion To Dismiss with Prejudice
[#100]1 filed April 21, 2015. After careful review of the motion and the file, I conclude
that the motion should be granted.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Stipulated Motion To Dismiss with Prejudice, is granted;
2. That all other pending motions, including those docketed as [#44 & #92], and
the pending objection [#98] are denied as moot;
3. That all pretrial deadlines are vacated;
4. That the motion hearing set for May 7, 2015, is vacated;
5. That the combined Final Pretrial Conference/Trial Preparation Conference set
for June 26, 2015, is vacated;
6. That the jury trial set to commence July 13, 2015, is vacated; and
1
“[#100]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.
6. That this action is dismissed with prejudice with the parties to pay their own
attorney fees and costs.
Dated April 21, 2015, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?