Keybank National Association v. Gelfond & Associates, P.C. et al

Filing 31

ORDER regarding 29 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendant Gelfond & Associates, P.C. Default judgment is granted for Plaintiff and against Defendant Gelfond & Associates, P.C., in the amount of $201,142.98, plus attorneys' fees, costs, and interest, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 10/7/2014. (eseam)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE Civil Case No. 14-cv-01757-LTB-MJW KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, v. GELFOND & ASSOCIATES, P.C., a Colorado corporation, LAWRENCE P. GELFOND, and JULIE L. GELFOND, jointly and severally, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ________________________________________________________________________ Upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendant Gelfond & Associates, P.C. (Doc 29), the Court finds as follows: 1. On June 24, 2014, Plaintiff filed its Complaint against Gelfond. 2. On June 24, 2014, the Clerk of Court issued a Summons for Gelfond. 3. On July 3, 2014, Gelfond acknowledged service of the Complaint. 4. Gelfond has not been represented by counsel. 5. On August 19, 2014, an Order was issued by this Court granting Defendants Lawrence P. Gelfond and Julie L. Gelfond up to and including September 9, 2014 to hire an attorney to file a response on behalf of Associates. 6. To date, Gelfond has not filed an Answer to the Complaint. 7. On September 29, 2014, the Clerk of Court entered Default against Gelfond. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that default judgment is granted for Plaintiff and against Defendant Gelfond & Associates, P.C., in the amount of $201,142.98, plus attorneys’ fees, costs, and interest. BY THE COURT: s/Lewis T. Babcock Lewis T. Babcock, Judge DATED: October 7, 2014

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?