Walcott v. USA et al

Filing 23

MINUTE ORDER granting 21 Motion for Leave to File Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Instanter. The Clerk of Court is directed to file Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 21-1) and attach the Declaration of Janet L. Walcott (Doc. No. 21-2) thereto, and Plaintiff's Opposition is deemed timely filed, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 11/20/14.(sgrim)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No. 14–cv–01758–REB–KMT JANET L. WALCOTT, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA Plaintiff’s “Motion for Leave to File Plaintiff’s Brief in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, Instanter” (Doc. No. 21, filed Nov. 19, 2014) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to file “Plaintiff’s Brief in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss” (Doc. No. 211) and attach the Declaration of Janet L. Walcott (Doc. No. 21-2) thereto, and Plaintiff’s Opposition is deemed timely filed. Plaintiff is advised that any future motion that is subject to, but fails to comply with, Local Rule 7.1(a) will be summarily denied. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(a) (“Before filing a motion, counsel for the moving party or an unrepresented party shall confer or make reasonable good faith efforts to confer with any opposing counsel or unrepresented party to resolve any disputed matter. The moving party shall describe in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the motion, the specific efforts to fulfill this duty.”). See also D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(b) (exempting motions filed in a case involving an unrepresented prisoner, and motions filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12, Fed. R. Civ. P. 56, and D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(b) from this conferral duty). Dated: November 20, 2014

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?