Barnett v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Montrose, The et al

Filing 56

ORDER denying 50 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 5/12/2015. (alowe)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 14-cv-01765-REB-MJW
STEPHANIE BARNETT,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF MONTROSE,
Defendant.

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Blackburn, J.
The matter before is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [#50],1 filed
March 20, 2015. I have jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 (federal
question) & 1367 (supplemental jurisdiction). Having reviewed the motion, response, and
reply, and having considered the apposite arguments, authorities, and evidence presented
by the parties, it is apparent that there exist genuine disputes of material fact that are not
appropriate for summary resolution.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
[#50], filed March 20, 2015, is denied.
Dated May 12, 2015, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:

1

“[#34]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.