Instamart Fulfillment LLC et al v. Instacart, Inc. et al

Filing 24

ORDER Granting Stipulation of Dismissal of Defendant Instacart, Inc. re 21 Motion to Dismiss. Defendant Instacart, Inc. is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). Each party shall pay its own costs and attorney fees. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 10/08/2014. (athom, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Christine M. Arguello Civil Action No. 14-cv-01808-CMA-KMT INSTAMART FULFILLMENT, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, and INSTAMART IP, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company, Plaintiffs, v. INSTACART, INC., a Delaware corporation, INSTACART FUND I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and MAPLEBEAR, INC. d/b/a INSTACART, a Delaware corporation, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT INSTACART, INC. This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Stipulated of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant Instacart, Inc. (Doc. # 21). The Court has reviewed the Stipulation and ORDERS as follows: Defendant Instacart, Inc. is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each party shall pay its own costs and attorney fees. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the caption on all subsequent filings shall reflect the removal of Instacart, Inc. as a Defendant in this case. DATED: October 8, 2014 BY THE COURT: _______________________________ CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?