Instamart Fulfillment LLC et al v. Instacart, Inc. et al
Filing
24
ORDER Granting Stipulation of Dismissal of Defendant Instacart, Inc. re 21 Motion to Dismiss. Defendant Instacart, Inc. is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). Each party shall pay its own costs and attorney fees. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 10/08/2014. (athom, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Christine M. Arguello
Civil Action No. 14-cv-01808-CMA-KMT
INSTAMART FULFILLMENT, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, and
INSTAMART IP, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company,
Plaintiffs,
v.
INSTACART, INC., a Delaware corporation,
INSTACART FUND I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and
MAPLEBEAR, INC. d/b/a INSTACART, a Delaware corporation,
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
OF DEFENDANT INSTACART, INC.
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Stipulated of Voluntary Dismissal
of Defendant Instacart, Inc. (Doc. # 21). The Court has reviewed the Stipulation and
ORDERS as follows:
Defendant Instacart, Inc. is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each party shall pay its own costs and attorney
fees.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the caption on all subsequent filings shall reflect
the removal of Instacart, Inc. as a Defendant in this case.
DATED: October 8, 2014
BY THE COURT:
_______________________________
CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?