Instamart Fulfillment LLC et al v. Instacart, Inc. et al

Filing 89

MINUTE ORDER; This matter comes before the court on the Stipulation to (1) Dismiss Defendant Whole Foods Market, Inc., (2) File Third Amended Complaint and (3) Apply Pending Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss to Third Amended Complaint 83 . The Clerk of Court is directed to file Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 83-1.) 65 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 5/29/15.(morti, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No. 14–cv–01808–CMA–KMT INSTAMART FULFULLMENT LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, and INSTAMART IP, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants. v. MAPLEBEAR, INC., D/B/A INSTACART, a Delaware corporation, WHOLE FOODS MARKET ROCKY MOUNTAIN/SOUTHWEST, L.P., a Texas limited partnership; WFM-WO, INC., a Delaware corporation, WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INC., a Texas corporation, Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs. MINUTE ORDER ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA This matter comes before the court on the Stipulation to (1) Dismiss Defendant Whole Foods Market, Inc., (2) File Third Amended Complaint and (3) Apply Pending Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss to Third Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 83, filed May 28, 2015.) The Clerk of Court is directed to file Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 83-1.) The “Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Whole Foods Market, Inc. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6)” (Doc. No. 65) is DENIED as moot. Defendant Maplebear, Inc.’s “Motion to Dismiss” (Doc. No. 22) and the “Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Whole Foods Market Rocky Mountain/Southwest, L.P. and WFM-WO, Inc.” (Doc. No. 66) are deemed to apply to the Third Amended Complaint. Dated: May 29, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?