Burns et al v. Hickenlooper et al
Filing
75
ORDER denying as moot 68 Motion for Attorney Fees. That the parties' Stipulation for Dismissal 74 is GRANTED. The above-captioned matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 1/28/2015.(tscha, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Raymond P. Moore
Civil Action No. 14-cv-01817-RM-KLM
CATHERINE BURNS;
SHEILA SCHROEDER;
MARK THRUN;
GEOFFREY BATEMAN;
RACHEL CATT;
CASSIE RUBALD;
BREANNA ALEXANDER;
STACY PARRISH;
ANGELA CRANMORE;
JULIANNE DELOY;
KAREN COLLIER; and
DENISE LORD;
Plaintiffs,
v.
JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER, JR., in his official capacity as Governor of Colorado;
JOHN SUTHERS, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Colorado; and
PAM ANDERSON, in her official capacity as Clerk and Recorder for Jefferson County,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal filed January
27, 2015 (ECF No. 74) advising they have settled the issue of attorney fees and costs, and
requesting the case be dismissed with prejudice. The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation and
being fully advised, hereby ORDERS as follows:
That the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses (ECF No. 68) is DENIED
as moot; and
That the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal (ECF No. 74) is GRANTED. The abovecaptioned matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Dated this 28th day of January, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
____________________________________
RAYMOND P. MOORE
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?