Metters v. Colvin
Filing
20
ORDER. The Court, having considered the parties' Stipulation to Remand for Further Proceedings, and good cause appearing therefor, hereby WITHDRAWS Defendant's Answer and REMANDS the case to the Commissioner for further agency action. Accordingly, it is ordered that this case is reversed and remanded for further proceedings under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), by Judge John L. Kane on 12/22/2014. (athom, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-01908-AP
DUANE C. METTERS,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
ORDER
The Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation to Remand for Further Proceedings,
and good cause appearing therefor, hereby WITHDRAWS Defendant’s Answer and
REMANDS the case to the Commissioner for further agency action.1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, upon remand, the agency’s Appeals Council shall
reopen Plaintiff’s subsequent favorable determination and consolidate it with the application at
issue in this appeal for further consideration. The Appeals Council shall also affirm that Plaintiff
was disabled as of his 50th birthday.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand Under Sentence Six
and his Motion to Supplement the Record are WITHDRAWN from the record at this time.
1
Pursuant to Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 297 (1993) and Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S.
89, 96 (1991), this Court will not enter judgment until “after post-remand agency proceedings
have been completed and their results filed with the court.”
Accordingly, it is ordered that this case is reversed and remanded for further proceedings
under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 22ND day of December, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/John L. Kane______
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?