Watts v. Smoke Guard, Inc. et al
Filing
65
MINUTE ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 4/23/15. Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Guardian ad Litem 33 is DENIED, with leave to refile a Stipulation with respect to the appointment of the Guardian ad Litem that reflect s the Parties' agreements on the matter no later than May 7, 2015; Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint 37 is GRANTED IN PART, and DENIED IN PART, with leave to tender a Second Amended Complaint on or before May 7 , 2015... Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Replies 49 is GRANTED IN PART, and DENIED IN PART, insofar as the Replies are accepted but a proposed Second Amended Complaint will be tendered as set forth above; Unopposed Motion for Extension o f Time to Extend Subpoena Deadline 53 will be DENIED as MOOT; Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order 58 is DENIED, with leave to refile once Simplex Grinnell has been served and has entered an appearance in the case so that all Parties may participate in a further discovery conference. (bsimm, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-01909-WYD-NYW
RAY TRIPP WATTS,
Plaintiff,
v.
SMOKE GUARD, INC.,
POWER PRODUCTS CO.,
THE RESIDENCES AT LITTLE NELL DEVELOPMENT, LLC,
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS
Entered by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang
The court held a Motions Hearing this morning on the following pending motions:
(1) Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Guardian ad Litem [#33];
(2) Plantiff’s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint [#37];
(3) Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Replies to Defendant Smoke Guard, Inc. and
Powers Products Co. Responses to Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Second
Amended Complaint [#49];
(4) Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Extend Subpoena Deadline filed by
Defendant Power Products, Co. [#53]; and
(5) Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order filed by Defendant Smoke Guard,
Inc. [#58].
For the reasons stated on the record, IT IS ORDERED:
(1) Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Guardian ad Litem [#33] is DENIED, with leave to
refile a Stipulation with respect to the appointment of the Guardian ad Litem that
reflects the Parties’ agreements on the matter no later than May 7, 2015;
(2) Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint [#37] is GRANTED
IN PART, and DENIED IN PART, with leave to tender a Second Amended
Complaint on or before May 7, 2015, that is consistent with Plaintiff’s withdrawal of
his demand for exemplary damages and the claim asserted against SimplexGrinnell,
L.P., the Stipulation regarding the Guardian ad Litem issue, and that has been
approved by Defendants pursuant to the discussion on the record. Plaintiff’s counsel
is directed to meet and confer with counsel for SimplexGrinnell who had previously
entered their appearance in an attempt to resolve any issues;
(3) Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Replies [#49] is GRANTED IN PART, and
DENIED IN PART, insofar as the Replies are accepted but a proposed Second
Amended Complaint will be tendered as set forth above;
(4) Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Extend Subpoena Deadline [#53] will be
DENIED as MOOT; and
(5) Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order [#58] is DENIED, with leave to
refile once Simplex Grinnell has been served and has entered an appearance in the
case so that all Parties may participate in a further discovery conference.
DATED: April 23, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?