Garza v. Western Stone of Lyons, LLC et al.
Filing
21
ORDER granting 19 Motion for Service by US Marshals at No Cost Pursuant to 28 USC § 1915. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/16/2014.(alowe)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
Civil Case No. 14-cv-01953-REB-BNB
ELOY GARZA,
Plaintiff,
v.
WESTERN STONE OF LYONS, LLC; and
PAUL W. FRYSIG,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER GRANTING SERVICE BY UNITED STATES MARSHAL
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter arises on the plaintiff’s Motion for Service by US Marshals at No Cost
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 [Doc. #19, filed 09/06/2014] (the “Motion”). The Motion is
GRANTED.
The plaintiff filed his Complaint on July 14, 2014. He was granted leave to proceed in
forma pauperis on August 14, 2014. He requests that the United States Marshal be directed
serve the defendants pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The addresses of the defendants are provided
in the Motion. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
(1) The Motion [Doc. #19] is GRANTED;
(2) The United States Marshal shall serve a copy of the Complaint, Summons, order
granting leave to proceed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915, and this order upon defendants Western
Stone of Lyons, LLC; and Paul W. Frysig. If appropriate, the Marshal shall first attempt to
obtain a waiver of service of these documents pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(d). All costs of service
shall be advanced by the United States; and
(3) Defendants Western Stone of Lyons, LLC; and Paul W. Frysig or counsel for the
defendants shall respond to the Complaint as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure after service of process on the defendants.
Dated September 16, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?