Shirazi v. Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America
PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 2/17/15. ORDERED that when filing restricted documents, parties MUST fully comply with the requirements of D.C.ColoL.CivR. 7.2. (cbssec)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-01955-PAB-CBS
TRAVELERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
The Court finds:
WHEREAS, certain information that is or may be produced and/or sought by discovery
requests in this action may constitute confidential or proprietary information, trade secrets or
other confidential research development or commercial information within the meaning of Fed.
R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1)(G); and that Discovery shall be facilitated if the parties are allowed to
produce such information under a protective order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c).
WHEREAS, pursuant to F.R.C.P. 26(c) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 30.2, the Court deems it
appropriate to limit disclosure of certain confidential information, as set forth below,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
This Order applies to all products of discovery and all information derived
therefrom, including, but not limited to, all documents and deposition testimony and any copies,
excerpts or summaries thereof, and all written, recorded, or graphic material produced, obtained
or created by any party or other person pursuant to the requirements of any court order, requests
for production of documents, requests for admissions, interrogatories, subpoenas, agreements or
any other materials stamped confidential in accordance with this order.
To be treated as confidential under this order, confidential documents must be
designated as “Confidential—Subject to Protective Order,” based on a good faith belief by the
party asserting confidentiality that the item falls within Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1)(G) .
Confidential discovery material will be used only for the litigation of this
action (“Litigation”), including any appeals of this litigation. Confidential discovery material
will not be disclosed except in accordance with paragraphs 4, 6 and 8.
Prior to being given access to stamped confidential documents, any person
falling within subparagraphs 6(a)(iv), 6(a)(v) or 6(a)(vii) shall be provided with a copy of this
Order and shall execute a copy of the Endorsement of Stipulation and Protective Order, attached
as Exhibit A. Counsel providing such access to stamped confidential documents shall retain
copies of the Endorsement(s) of Stipulation and Protective Order and shall provide them to
counsel producing stamped confidential documents as provided below. For testifying experts, a
copy of the Endorsement of Stipulation and Protective Order executed by the testifying expert
shall be furnished to counsel for the party who produced the stamped confidential documents to
which the expert has access, either at the time the confidential material is provided to the
testifying expert, or at the time the expert’s designation is served, whichever is later.
Stamped confidential documents shall have the following language stamped on
each page that contains confidential information, or shall otherwise have such language clearly
CONFIDENTIAL—SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
Such stamping or marking will take place prior to production by the producing
party, or subsequent to selection by the receiving party for copying but prior to the actual
copying if done expeditiously. The stamp or marking shall be affixed or placed in such a manner
as to not obliterate or obscure any written matter.
In the case of deposition testimony,
confidentiality designations shall be made within 30 days after the date this order is entered or
within 30 days after the taking of such deposition, whichever shall occur later, and shall specify
the testimony designated confidential by page and line number(s). Until the expiration of such
30 day period, the entire text of the deposition, excluding documents previously produced and
not marked confidential, shall be treated as confidential under this Order. Should no designation
be made during the 30 day period, then the entirety of the deposition shall not be considered
Stamped confidential documents shall be used solely for the purposes of this
litigation and for no other purpose without prior written approval from the Court or the prior
written consent of the producing party or person. All persons receiving or given access to
stamped confidential documents in accordance with the terms of this Order consent to the
continuing jurisdiction of the Court for the purposes of enforcing this Order and remedying any
Stamped confidential documents shall not be disclosed to anyone other
than the following categories of persons:
The Court (and any appellate court), including court personnel,
jurors, and alternate jurors only in the manner provided in paragraph 8 below;
If produced by Plaintiff, the named Defendant to this litigation,
including Defendant’s officers, directors, agents, employees, insurers, reinsurers, lawyers, and
auditors to whom knowledge of such material is necessary for the preparation and trial of this
case or as required in the normal course of business, Defendant’s attorneys in this litigation,
including the paralegal, clerical, secretarial, and other staff employed or retained by such
If produced by Defendant, Plaintiff’s attorneys in this litigation,
including the paralegal, clerical, secretarial, and other staff employed or retained by such counsel
and employees and consultants of the producing party;
Court reporters (including persons operating video recording
equipment at depositions) and persons preparing transcripts of testimony to the extent necessary
to prepare such transcripts;
Retained experts, advisors and consultants, including persons
directly employed by such experts, advisors and consultants, (collectively “Experts”) but only to
the extent necessary to perform their work in connection with this litigation;
The persons who authored the stamped confidential documents or
who received such stamped confidential documents in the ordinary course of business;
Such persons as the parties’ counsel shall consent to in writing
before the proposed disclosure.
All parties and their respective counsel, paralegals, employees and
assistants receiving stamped confidential documents material shall take all steps reasonably
necessary to prevent the disclosure of stamped confidential documents other than in accordance
with the terms of this Order.
Disclosure of stamped confidential documents other than in accordance
with the terms of this Order may subject the disclosing person to such sanctions and remedies as
the Court may deem appropriate, including, without limitation, contempt, injunctive relief, and
If at any time a party wishes for any reason to dispute a designation of
stamped confidential documents as confidential hereunder, such party shall notify the
designating party of such dispute in writing, specifying the exact document numbers of the
stamped confidential documents in dispute and the precise nature of the dispute with regard to
each such stamped confidential document. If the parties are unable to resolve the dispute, the
proponent of confidentiality shall apply by motion to the Court for a ruling as to whether or not
the stamped confidential documents are entitled to confidential status or protection, provided
such motion is made within 30 days from the date on which the parties, after a good faith
attempt, cannot resolve the dispute or such other time period as the parties may agree. The Court
will deny the motion unless the proponent of confidentiality shows that there is good cause for
the document to have such protection.
All stamped confidential documents, whether or not such designation is in
dispute pursuant to subparagraph 7(a) above, shall retain that designation and be treated as
confidential in accordance with the terms hereof unless and until:
the time period for filing a Motion for Protective Order set forth in
paragraph 7(a) has expired without the filing of any such motion;
the producing party agrees in writing that the material is no longer
confidential and subject to the terms of this Order; or
ten days after the expiration of the appeal period (or such longer
time as ordered by this Court) of an Order of this court that the matter shall not be entitled to
confidential status if the Order on appeal is not subject to a stay.
The parties shall comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1 and negotiate in
good faith before filing any motion relating to this Order.
Except as provided for herein, nothing in this Order shall prevent or
restrict counsel for any party in any way from retaining control over disclosure of its own
confidential materials, including that party’s right to inspect, review or use materials produced
by that party, including discovery material designated as confidential;
Nothing shall prevent disclosure beyond that required under this Order if
the producing party consents in writing to such disclosure, or if the Court, after notice to all
affected parties, orders such disclosure and that Order is not subject to any appellate stay within
20 days after it is issued.
No disclosure pursuant to this Paragraph 8 shall waive any rights or
privileges of any party granted by this Order.
Any stamped confidential document that is filed with the Court, and any pleading,
motion, or other paper filed with the Court containing or disclosing any stamped confidential
documents or information therefrom shall be accompanied by a motion to restrict setting forth
the matters required by D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2(c), with a cover page stating:
THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
COVERED BY A PROTECTIVE ORDER OF THE COURT AND IS
SUBMITTED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO THAT PROTECTIVE
ORDER. THE CONFIDENTIAL CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT
MAY NOT BE DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE EXPRESS ORDER OF THE
Provided sufficient basis is shown to restrict public access to the document pursuant to
D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2(c), said stamped confidential documents and/or papers containing
information therefrom shall be kept under seal until further order of the Court; however, said
stamped confidential documents and/or papers containing information therefrom filed under seal
shall be available to the Court and counsel of record, and to all other persons entitled to receive
the confidential information contained therein under the terms of this Order.
This Order shall not enlarge or affect the proper scope of discovery in this or any
other litigation, nor shall this Order imply that stamped confidential documents are properly
discoverable, relevant or admissible in this or any other litigation. Each party reserves the right
to object to any disclosure of stamped confidential documents and/or information therefrom that
the producing party designates as stamped confidential documents on any other ground it may
The entry of this Order shall be without prejudice as to the rights of the parties, or
any one of them, or of any non-party to assert or apply for additional or different protection.
All parties and counsel for such parties in this litigation shall make a good faith
effort to ensure that their experts, employees, and agents comply fully with this Order. In the
event of a change in counsel, retiring counsel shall fully instruct new counsel of their
responsibilities under this Order.
The terms of this Order shall survive and remain in effect after the termination of
this litigation. The parties shall take such measures as necessary and appropriate to prevent the
public disclosure of stamped confidential documents and/or information therefrom, through
inadvertence or otherwise, after the conclusion of this litigation.
Within 30 days after the termination of this litigation (including any appeals) or
such other time as the producing party may agree in writing, the parties shall return all stamped
confidential documents (and all copies thereof) to counsel for the producing party, with the
exception of any materials that would be protected by the work product doctrine.
If a receiving party or its counsel or expert is served with a subpoena or other
process by any court, administrative or legislative body, or any other person or organization
which calls for production of any stamped confidential documents produced by another party, the
party to whom the subpoena or other process is directed shall not, to the extent permitted by
applicable law, provide or otherwise disclose such documents until 10 business days after
notifying counsel for the producing party in writing of all of the following:
the information and documentation that is requested for production in the
the date on which compliance with the subpoena is requested;
the location at which compliance with the subpoena is requested;
the identity of the party serving the subpoena; and
the case name, jurisdiction and index, docket, complaint, charge, civil
action or other identification number or other designation identifying the litigation,
administrative proceeding or other proceeding in which the subpoena has been issued. The
party, counsel, or expert receiving the subpoena or other process shall cooperate with the
producing party in any proceeding relating thereto.
Inadvertent production of documents that would otherwise be subject to
designation as “Confidential—Subject to Protective Order” pursuant to the terms of this order
shall not constitute a waiver of the right of the producing party to mark the document as
“Confidential—Subject to Protective Order”, provided that the producing party promptly notify
the receiving party in writing of such inadvertently produced documents and all copies thereof.
Provided the party has a good faith belief that the item falls within Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1)(G),
the producing party may, subsequent to such inadvertent production, notify the receiving party
that the inadvertently produced document should be designated as “Confidential—Subject to
Protective Order.” Following notification by the producing party, the receiving party shall treat
the inadvertently produced document as if it had been designated as “Confidential—Subject to
Protective Order” prior to production and the terms of this Order shall apply to such document.
This order does not restrict or limit the use of stamped confidential documents at
any hearing or trial, which proceedings are expected to be the subject of a further protective
order and/or appropriate court orders. Prior to any hearing or trial at which the use of stamped
confidential documents is anticipated, the parties shall meet and confer regarding the use of
stamped confidential documents. If the parties cannot agree, the parties shall request the Court
rule on such procedures.
This Order shall not prevent any persons bound hereby from making use of
information or documents without the restrictions of this Order if the information or documents
are lawfully in their possession and/or lawfully obtained through discovery in this litigation or
there has been a final judgment (including any appeal therefrom) declaring that such information
or documents are not confidential in this or any other case.
Nothing in this Order shall limit or circumscribe in any manner, any rights the
parties may have under common law or pursuant to any statute, regulation or ethical cannon.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this _____ day of February, 2015
BY THE COURT:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Craig B. Shaffer
United States Magistrate Judge
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
s/ David J. Furtado
David J. Furtado
Furtado Law PC
3773 Cherry Creek North Drive, Ste. 575
Denver, Colorado 80209
Counsel for Plaintiff
s/ Jonathan M. Allen
Amy M. Samberg
Jonathan M. Allen
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
1200 17th Street, Suite 1900
Denver, CO 80202
Telephone: (303) 634-2000
Facsimile: (303) 634-2020
Attorneys for Defendant
Endorsement of Stipulation and Protective Order
I, _________________________________, have read the Protective Order filed in the
case of Abe Shirazi v. Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America, and agree to abide by
the provisions set forth in that order.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?