Hammond v. Beicker et al
MINUTE ORDER denying 44 Motion to Intervene as Plaintiffs with Newly Discovered Evidence by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/26/2015.(mdave, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-01991-MEH
CATHY DOE, Nurse,
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on May 26, 2015.
The Motion to Intervene as Plaintiffs with Newly Discovered Evidence under Fed. R. Civ.
P. Rule 24(a) [filed May 22, 2015; docket #44] is denied. First, this case was closed on December
29, 2014. Second, the motion reflects the caption, “Andrea Hammond JD v. Sheriff Beicker”;
however, the claim against Sheriff Beiker was jointly dismissed with prejudice on October 6, 2014
and the case proceeded only against Cathy Doe, Nurse. Third, the movants do not provide any
information to allow the Court to determine whether they may intervene as of right or may be
permitted to intervene. Finally, the motion is not accompanied by any proposed pleading that “sets
out the claim or defense for which intervention is sought.” See Fed. R. Civ. P. 24.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?