Talmadge v. Walgreens et al
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The 43 Stipulated Motion for Dismissal with prejudice is APPROVED. Defendant Rebecca Chacon's 37 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED AS MOOT. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/23/2015.(alowe)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 14-cv-02003-REB-CBS
WALGREENS, a/k/a WALGREENS CO.,
HOWARD ATLAS, and
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The matter before me is the Stipulated Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice
[#43],1 filed February 10, 2015. After careful review of the stipulation and the file, I
conclude that the stipulation should be approved and that this action should be
dismissed with prejudice.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Stipulated Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice [#43], filed
February 10, 2015, is APPROVED;
2. That all extant pretrial deadlines are VACATED;
“[#43]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.
3. That any currently pending motion, including, but not limited to, Defendant
Rebecca Chacon’s Motion for Summary Judgment [#37], filed December 31, 2014,
is DENIED AS MOOT;
4. That the combined Final Pretrial Conference and Trial Preparation
Conference set May 8, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., and the jury trial set to commence June 8,
2015, are VACATED; and
5. That this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with the parties to pay
their own attorney fees and costs.
Dated February 23, 2015, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?