Walters v. S&F Holdings, LLC et al
Filing
72
ORDER granting 71 Motion to Dismiss Jason Schuh and Stacie Schuh Contingent on Them Not Being Designated as Non-Parties at Fault. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 8/20/2015.(mlace, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 14-cv-02006-REB-MJW
BRIANNA WALTERS,
Plaintiff,
v.
S&F HOLDINGS, LLC, d/b/a “WILLOW RIDGE MANOR,”
GREGORY SARGOWICKI,
JASON SCHUH,
STACIE SCHUH, and
DOES I-X
Defendants.
ORDER DISMISSING PARTIES
Blackburn, J.
The matter is before me on the plaintiff’s Motion To Dismiss Jason Schuh and
Stacie Schuh Contingent on Them Not Being Designated as Non-Parties at Fault
[#71]1 filed August 19, 2015. After careful review of the motion and the file, I conclude
that the motion should be granted and that the claims of plaintiff against defendants,
Jason Schuh and Stacie Schuh, should be dismissed without prejudice.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Motion To Dismiss Jason Schuh and Stacie Schuh Contingent on
Them Not Being Designated as Non-Parties at Fault is granted;
2. That the claims of plaintiff against defendants, Jason Schuh and Stacie Schuh,
1
“[#71]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.
are dismissed without prejudice; and
3. That defendants, Jason Schuh and Stacie Schuh, are dropped as parties to
this action, and the caption shall be amended accordingly.
Dated August 20, 2015, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?