Avenue Capital Management II, LP et al v. Schaden et al

Filing 43

MINUTE ORDER. ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss [#16, filed in Civil Action No. 14-cv-02119-PAB-KLM] and the Motion to Stay [#35] are DENIED as moot by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 11/12/14.(jhawk, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-02031-PAB-KLM (Consolidated with Civil Action No. 14-cv-02119-PAB-KLM) AVENUE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, et al., Plaintiffs, v. RICHARD F. SCHADEN, an individual, et al., Defendants. RICHARD F. SCHADEN, Plaintiff, v. AVENUE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT II, L.P., and FORTRESS INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Defendant Avenue Capital Management II, L.P. and Defendant Fortress Investment Group, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for a Stay [#16, filed in Civil Action No. 14-cv-02119-PAB-KLM] (the “Motion to Dismiss”), Plaintiff Richard F. Schaden’s (“Schaden”) Unopposed Motion to Extend Stay of Proceedings [#35] (the “Motion to Stay”), and on Plaintiff Schaden’s Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice [#42] (the “Notice”). In the Notice, Plaintiff Schaden seeks voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A) of the portion of this consolidated action that was part of Civil Action No. 14-cv-02119-PAB-KLM. The Motion to Dismiss and the Motion to Stay both solely concern the the portion of this consolidated action that Plaintiff now seeks to dismiss. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss [#16, filed in Civil Action No. 14-cv-02119-PAB-KLM] and the Motion to Stay [#35] are DENIED as moot. Dated: November 12, 2014

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?