Meeker v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc. et al
Filing
94
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 92 Motion for Leave. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 3-20-15. (nywlc2)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-02101-WYD-NYW
MICHELLE MEEKER,
Plaintiff,
v.
LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. d/b/a HERITAGE PARK CARE CENTER;
COLORADO MEDICAL INVESTORS, LLC d/b/a HERITAGE PARK CARE CENTER;
TOWN OF CARBONDALE, COLORADO;
EUGENE SCHILLING;
MICHAEL ZIMMERMAN;
ROBERT BAKER;
JESSICA VARLEY; and
MELANIE HOLMES,
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang
This civil action comes before the court on Plaintiff Michelle Meeker’s (also “Plaintiff”)
Motion for Leave to Address Additional Pending Motions During the March 20, 2015 Hearing
[#92], filed March 19, 2015 (the “Motion”). Pursuant to the Order Referring Case dated July 29,
2014 [#6] and the memorandum dated March 19, 2015 [#93], the Motion is before this
Magistrate Judge.
IT IS SO ORERED that Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN
PART. The court intends to address Plaintiff’s pending Motion to Amend Complaint Pursuant to
F.R.C.P. 15(a) [#67], and the pending Motion by certain Defendants for a Protective Order
Regarding Plaintiff’s F.R.C.P. 34 Site Inspection [#71] at the previously scheduled March 20,
2015 hearing. The court does not contemplate addressing the pending Motion by certain
Defendants for a Protective Order in Response to Plaintiff’s Objection to Documents Stamped
“Confidential” [#61] at the March 20, 2015 hearing.
DATED March 20, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?