Waller v. City and County of Denver et al
Filing
86
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for Motion Hearing held on 3/3/2015 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Motion to Order the City and County of Denver to Comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1) Mandatory Disclosures and for Sanctions for their Failure to Comply 76 is DENIED. Motion for Leave of Court to File Amended Complaint 46 is SUBMITTED and TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. Separate order to issue. FTR: Courtroom C-205. (bsimm, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE NINA Y. WANG
Civil Action:
Courtroom Deputy:
14-cv-02109-WYD-NYW
Brandy Simmons
Parties
Date: March 3, 2015
FTR: NYW COURTROOM C-205
Counsel
ANTHONY WALLER,
CHRISTOPHER COLBRUNO,
Kenneth Alfredo Padilla
Plaintiffs,
V
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER,
BRADY LOVINGIER,
GINA MCCALL,
David Charles Cooperstein
Evan P. Lee
Peter H. Doherty
Defendants,
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER
MOTIONS HEARING
Court in Session: 1:32 p.m.
Appearance of counsel. Parties are advised regarding duty to confer pursuant to D.C.Colo.LCivR
7.1(a).
Argument held on Motion to Order the City and County of Denver to Comply with Fed.R.Civ.P.
26(a)(1) Mandatory Disclosures and for Sanctions for their Failure to Comply [76] filed on
January 15, 2015, and Motion for Leave of Court to File Amended Complaint [46] filed on
November 13, 2014.
For the reasons stated on the record, it is
ORDERED: Motion to Order the City and County of Denver to Comply with Fed.R.Civ.P.
26(a)(1) Mandatory Disclosures and for Sanctions for their Failure to Comply
[76] is DENIED.
ORDERED: Motion for Leave of Court to File Amended Complaint [46] is SUBMITTED
and TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. Separate order to issue.
Court in Recess: 2:43 p.m.
Hearing concluded.
Total time in Court: 01:11
* To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?