De Arment v. Aetna Life Insurance Company

Filing 47

MINUTE ORDER: Plaintiff filed an 42 Amended Complaint asserting claims under Washington law instead of Colorado law. Aetna's 12 Motion to Dismiss is denied as moot and the 36 Recommendation of United States Magistrate is terminated on the docket of the court. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/16/2015. (alowe)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 14-cv-02112-REB-KLM SOPHIA CLAIRE DE ARMENT, Plaintiff, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. MINUTE ORDER1 The matters before the court are: (1) Aetna’s Motion To Dismiss [#12]2 filed August 27, 2014; and (2) the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#36] filed November 10, 2014. The motion to dismiss addresses only the claim of the plaintiff under §10-3-1115, C.R.S., as asserted in her complaint [#4]. In the recommendation [#36], the magistrate judge recommends that the motion to dismiss be granted as to the claim of the plaintiff under §10-3-1115, C.R.S. Rather than file an objection to the recommendation [#36], the plaintiff filed an amended complaint [#42] asserting claims under Washington law instead of Colorado law. The plaintiff no longer asserts a claim under §10-3-1115, C.R.S. The amended complaint [#42] renders moot both Aetna’s Motion To Dismiss [#12] and the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#36]. After reviewing the motion, the file, and the record, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. That Aetna’s Motion To Dismiss [#12] filed August 27, 2014, is denied as moot; and 2. That the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#36] filed November 10, 2014, is terminated on the docket of the court. Dated: March 16, 2015. 1 This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E. Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado. 2 “[#12]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?