Archuleta v. Blac-Frac Tanks, Inc.
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order; granting in part and denying in part 32 Defendant's Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/25/2015.Initial expert disclosures due by 3/23/2015. Rebuttal expert disclosures due by 5/11/2015. Discovery due by 6/30/2015. Dispositive Motions due by 7/31/2015. (mdave )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-02222-MSK-MEH
DELBERT L. ARCHULETA,
BLAC-FRAC TANKS, INC.,
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on February 25, 2015.
Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order [filed February 20,
2015; docket #29] and Defendant’s Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order [filed February 24,
2015; docket #32]. The Court finds no reasonable basis on which to deny Plaintiff’s motion
outright, particularly because the Defendant does not oppose Plaintiff’s primary request to extend
the expert disclosure deadline. The Court finds good cause to extend both the Plaintiff’s request and
the Defendant’s request (in part) to extend the initial expert and rebuttal expert disclosure deadlines.
However, the Court disagrees both with the Plaintiff that the discovery deadline need not be
extended and with the Defendant that the discovery deadline be extended longer than 30 days.
Accordingly, the Court grants in part and denies in part the motions, and finds good cause
to modify paragraph 9 of the Scheduling Order as follows:
Initial expert disclosures due:
Rebuttal expert disclosures due:
Dispositive motions due:
March 23, 2015
May 11, 2015
June 30, 2015
July 31, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?