Chasteen v. Mesa County Detention Facility
Filing
12
ORDER dismissing this action without prejudice, and denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 10/29/14. 11 Affidavit of Leave to Proceed (Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915) is denied as moot. (dkals, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-02332-BNB
JOSHUA LAFOY CHASTEEN,
Plaintiff,
v.
MESA COUNTY COMBINED COURT,
Defendant.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff, Joshua Lafoy Chasteen, is detained at the Mesa County Detention
Facility, in Grand Junction, Colorado. Mr. Chasteen initiated this action on August 21,
2014, by filing a “Notice of Claim” (ECF No. 1) complaining about the conditions of his
confinement. The Court opened this case pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On August 22, 2014, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland reviewed Mr. Chasteen’s
filing and determined that it was deficient. Magistrate Judge Boland directed Plaintiff to
submit a Prisoner’s Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915 and a Prisoner Complaint on the court-approved forms. Magistrate Judge
Boland advised Mr. Chasteen that he could pay the $400.00 filing fee in lieu of
submitting a § 1915 motion and affidavit. Plaintiff was warned in the August 22 Order
that failure to cure the deficiencies would result in dismissal of this action without further
notice.
On September 18, 2014, Plaintiff filed a letter with the Court (ECF No. 7)
requesting an extension of time to comply with the August 22 Order and asking the
Court to provide him with copies of the necessary forms. Magistrate Judge Boland
granted the request in a September 22, 2014 Minute Order, and directed Mr. Chasteen
to comply within thirty days. (Id.). Magistrate Judge Boland also directed the Clerk of
the Court to mail to Plaintiff copies of the court-approved forms for filing a Prisoner
Complaint and a Prisoner’s Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915. (Id.). Copies of the court-approved forms were mailed to Plaintiff on
September 22, 2014. (See ECF No. 9).
On September 23, 2014, before he received copies of the court-approved forms
sent to him on September 22, 2104, Mr. Chasteen filed a document with the Court,
which the clerk’s office docketed as a “complaint.” (ECF No. 10). Plaintiff also filed an
“Affidavit of Leave to Proceed (Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915)” on September 23, 2014.
(ECF No. 11). The documents filed by Plaintiff on September 23 are deficient because
they were not submitted on the court-approved forms.
Mr. Chasteen has now failed to cure the deficiencies enumerated in the August
22 Order. The copy of the August 22 Order sent to Plaintiff has not been returned to the
Court as undeliverable, so the Court assumes he received the Order, along with the
copies of the court-approved forms mailed to him on September 23, 2014. However,
Mr. Chasteen has not communicated with the Court since September 23, 2013.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule
41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the failure of Plaintiff, Joshua Lafoy
Chasteen, to comply with the August 22, 2014 Order Directing Plaintiff to Cure
Deficiencies and the September 22, 2014 Minute Order. It is
2
FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is
denied for the purpose of appeal. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. See
Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). If Mr. Chasteen files a notice of
appeal he must also pay the full $505 appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in
forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty
days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the “Affidavit of Leave to Proceed (Pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915),” (ECF No. 11), filed on September 23, 2014, is DENIED as moot.
DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 29th day of
October
, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/Lewis T. Babcock
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge
United States District Court
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?