Beatty v. Vitrolife, Inc.
Filing
30
COURTROOM MINUTES for Motion Hearing held before Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/22/2015. Granting 20 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. A written opinion will be entered. FTR: K. Terasaki. (ebuch)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Date:
Courtroom Deputy:
FTR Technician:
October 22, 2015
Emily Buchanan
Kathy Terasaki
Civil Action No. 14-cv-02357-RPM
Counsel:
DAWN BEATTY,
John Cimino
Plaintiff,
v.
VITROLIFE, INC., a Colorado corporation,
Austin Smith
Michelle Muhleisen
Defendant.
COURTROOM MINUTES
MOTION HEARING
10:58 a.m.
Court in session.
Court follows Rule 56(c) and does not have practice standards regarding how to respond to a
motion for summary judgment. Court provides its understanding of the case.
11:05 a.m.
Mr. Cimino answers Court’s questions and provides facts he contends support
plaintiff’s claims.
ORDERED: Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 20) is GRANTED. A
written opinion will be entered.
11:10 a.m.
Court in recess.
Hearing concluded. Total time:
12 minutes.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?