Beatty v. Vitrolife, Inc.

Filing 30

COURTROOM MINUTES for Motion Hearing held before Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/22/2015. Granting 20 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. A written opinion will be entered. FTR: K. Terasaki. (ebuch)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Date: Courtroom Deputy: FTR Technician: October 22, 2015 Emily Buchanan Kathy Terasaki Civil Action No. 14-cv-02357-RPM Counsel: DAWN BEATTY, John Cimino Plaintiff, v. VITROLIFE, INC., a Colorado corporation, Austin Smith Michelle Muhleisen Defendant. COURTROOM MINUTES MOTION HEARING 10:58 a.m. Court in session. Court follows Rule 56(c) and does not have practice standards regarding how to respond to a motion for summary judgment. Court provides its understanding of the case. 11:05 a.m. Mr. Cimino answers Court’s questions and provides facts he contends support plaintiff’s claims. ORDERED: Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 20) is GRANTED. A written opinion will be entered. 11:10 a.m. Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Total time: 12 minutes.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?