Martinez v. Health Care Partners Foundation Inc.

Filing 21

MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10/29/14. Plaintiffs [sic] Counter Motion to Dismiss 15 is DENIED.(lgale, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-02399-RM-KLM MICHAEL ANGELO MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. HEALTH CARE PARTNERS FOUNDATION, INC., Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs [sic] Counter Motion to Dismiss [#15]1 (the “Motion”). Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter without an attorney. The Motion was titled as a motion and the Clerk’s Office therefore filed it as a motion. However, the Motion begins by asking the Court “to not grant Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss” and continues by offering Plaintiff’s arguments as to why Defendant Health Care Partners & Employees’ Motion to Dismiss [#7] should be denied. In addition, on October 1, 2014, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a response to Defendant Health Care Partners & Employees’ Motion to Dismiss [#7] on or before October 31, 2014. Minute Order [#10] at 2. The instant Motion was filed on October 15, 2014. Based on the content of the Motion and the fact that the Motion was filed shortly after Plaintiff was ordered to file a response to Defendant Health Care Partners & Employees’ Motion to Dismiss [#7], the Court understands the Motion to be a response to Defendant Health Care Partners & Employees’ Motion to Dismiss [#7], not a motion requesting affirmative relief. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#15] is DENIED. The Court will review the Motion and treat it as a response to Defendant Health Care Partners & Employees’ Motion to Dismiss [#7] when considering that motion. Dated: October 29, 2014 1 “[#15]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this Minute Order.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?