Session v. Clemings et al

Filing 102

MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/21/16. Motion to Cease and Stop the Ignoring of Legal Library Request and Court Imposed Deadlines # 93 is DENIED as moot. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion to Suppor t Fourth Amended Complaint and Response to Defendants' Motion in Opposition to Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint # 94 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion to Cease and Desist [All] Obstruction in the [Preparation] of Plaintiff['s] Legal Documents to the Courts # 97 is DENIED as moot.(lgale, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-02406-PAB-KLM
FRANKY L. SESSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
CLEMENTS, Deputy Sheriff, in his official and individual capacities,
ANDREWS, Deputy Sheriff, in his official and individual capacities,
ROMERO, Deputy Sheriff Captain, in his official and individual capacities, and
JORDAN, Deputy Sheriff Sergeant, in his official and individual capacities,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Cease and Stop the
Ignoring of Legal Library Request and Court Imposed Deadlines [#93] (the “First
Motion to Cease”); on Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion to Support
Fourth Amended Complaint and Response to Defendants’ Motion in Opposition to
Plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Complaint [#94] (the “Motion for Extension”); and on
Plaintiff’s Motion to Cease and Desist [All] Obstruction in the [Preparation] of
Plaintiff[’s] Legal Documents to the Courts [#97] (the “Second Motion to Cease”).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Extension [#94] is GRANTED.
Plaintiff’s Reply [#99] in support of his Motion for Leave to File Fourth Amended Prisoner
Complaint [#85] is accepted as timely filed.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the First Motion to Cease [#93] and the Second
Motion to Cease [#97] are DENIED as moot. In short, Plaintiff asks the Court to direct the
law librarian to provide him with more time and resources with which he can complete his
Reply [#99] in support of his Motion for Leave to File Fourth Amended Prisoner Complaint
[#85]. Because Plaintiff’s Reply [#99] has been accepted for filing with the Court and will
be reviewed in connection with the adjudication of his Motion for Leave to File Fourth
Amended Prisoner Complaint [#85], and because Plaintiff identifies no part of his Reply
which he believes is now deficient, the Motions to Cease [#93, #97] are moot.

Dated: January 21, 2016