Who Ya Gonna Call Bark Busters Pty., Ltd. v. G'Day Pet Care, LLC et al
Filing
30
MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Scheduling Conference held on 1/22/2015. ORDERED: Defendant G'Day Pet Care, LLC's MOTION 16 to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claims Under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) is GRANTED without prejudice. The first and second claims for relief are dismissed without prejudice. The Plaintiff is given leave to file an amended complaint and it must be filed by February 12, 2015. Discovery due by 6/26/2015. Dispositive Moti ons due by 7/24/2015. ORDERED: A Telephone Status Conference is set for July 1, 2015 at 8:30 a.m. Mountain Time, to discuss any possible pending motions for summary judgment and to set a Final Pretrial Conference and Trial date if necessary. Parties participating in the conference shall initiate a conference call amongst themselves and call the Court at (303) 844-2117 at the scheduled time. FTR: Courtroom A-402. (amont)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer
Civil Action: 14-cv-02410-CBS
Courtroom Deputy: Amanda Montoya
Date: January 22, 2015
FTR – Reporter Deck-Courtroom A402
Parties:
Counsel:
WHO YA GONNA CALL BARK
BUSTERS PTY., LTD.,
Jeffrey Faucette
Plaintiff,
v.
G’DAY PET CARE, LLC, et al.,
Marc Levy
Defendant.
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER
HEARING: RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
Court in session: 08:23 a.m.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
Discussion regarding Defendant G’Day Pet Care, LLC’s MOTION [16] to Dismiss Plaintiff’s
Claims Under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a). Mr. Levy rests on the briefs. Mr. Faucette provides oral
argument.
ORDERED: Defendant G’Day Pet Care, LLC’s MOTION [16] to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Claims
Under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) is GRANTED without prejudice. The first and second
claims for relief are dismissed without prejudice.
The Plaintiff is given leave to file an amended complaint and it must be filed by
February 12, 2015.
THE FOLLOWING WILL CONFIRM THE ACTIONS TAKEN AND DATES SET AT
THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HELD THIS DATE:
Each distinct group of parties shall be limited to 10 depositions.
Each distinct group of parties shall be limited to 25 interrogatories, 25 requests for production,
and 25 requests for admission.
Joinder of Parties/Amendment to Pleadings: February 20, 2015
Discovery Cut-off: June 26, 2015
Dispositive Motions Deadline: July 24, 2015
Each side shall be limited to 2 expert witnesses, absent leave of court.
Parties shall designate affirmative experts on or before: May 15, 2015
Parties shall designate rebuttal experts on or before: June 15, 2015
Interrogatories, requests for Production of Documents and Requests for Admissions shall be
served no later than THIRTY THREE DAYS prior to close of discovery.
ORDERED: A Telephone Status Conference is set for July 1, 2015 at 8:30 a.m. Mountain
Time, to discuss any possible pending motions for summary judgment and to set a
Final Pretrial Conference and Trial date if necessary. Parties participating in the
conference shall initiate a conference call amongst themselves and call the Court
at (303) 844-2117 at the scheduled time.
Counsel may not file any OPPOSED discovery motions without leave of court. Counsel are
instructed that should a discovery dispute arise they are to comply with Local Rule 7.1A. in
an effort to resolve the issues. If that is unsuccessful, counsel shall establish a conference
call adding Magistrate Judge Shaffer as the last connection. The Court will hear
arguments and attempt to mediate a resolution. The Court will instruct counsel at that time
as to whether or not to file a discovery motion.
Discussion regarding REQUEST[29] to Enter Default as to Defendant Liam Crowe.
Scheduling Order is signed and entered with interlineations.
Hearing concluded.
Court in recess: 08:50 a.m.
Total time in court: 00:27
To order transcripts of hearings please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?