Barrow v. Doe
Filing
10
ORDER dismissing this action without prejudice, and denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 11/7/14. (dkals, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-02464-BNB
DONNELL BARROW,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN DOE et al.,
MEDICAL STAFF,
ADMINISTRATION, and
FBOP,
Defendants.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff, Donnell Barrow, is a prisoner in the custody of the Federal Bureau of
Prisons who currently is incarcerated at the United States Penitentiary, High Security, in
Florence, Colorado. On September 4, 2014, Mr. Barrow filed pro se a Prisoner
Complaint (ECF No. 1) for injunctive relief and money damages pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1331 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.
388 (1971), as well as 42 U.S.C. § 1985. Mr. Barrow has been granted leave to
proceed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
On September 17, 2014, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland entered an order
directing Mr. Barrow to submit an amended Prisoner Complaint on the proper, Courtapproved form that sued the proper parties, alleged the personal participation of each
named defendant, complied with the pleading requirements of Rule 8 of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure, and complied with the legibility requirements of Rule 10.1 of
the Local Rules of Practice for this Court. The September 17 order directed Mr. Barrow
to obtain, with the assistance of his case manager or the facility’s legal assistant, the
Court-approved form for filing a Prisoner Complaint, and to use that form in filing an
amended Prisoner Complaint. The September 17 order warned him that if he failed to
file an amended Prisoner Complaint as directed within thirty days, some claims against
some Defendants or the entire Prisoner Complaint and the action may be dismissed
without further notice. On October 1, 2014, Magistrate Judge Boland entered a minute
order directing the clerk of the Court to mail to Mr. Barrow the Court-approved form for
filing a Prisoner Complaint, and allowing Mr. Barrow thirty days in which to file the
amended Prisoner Complaint as directed in the September 17 order. The minute order
reminded Mr. Barrow that failure to do so within the time allowed may result in the
dismissal of the instant action.
Mr. Barrow has failed to file an amended Prisoner Complaint as directed within
the time allowed, or otherwise to communicate with the Court in any way. Therefore,
the Prisoner Complaint and the action will be dismissed without prejudice for Mr.
Barrow’s failure to file an amended Prisoner Complaint as directed within the time
allowed, and for his failure to prosecute.
Finally, the Court certifies pursuant to § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this
order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status will be
denied for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438
(1962). If Mr. Barrow files a notice of appeal he also must pay the full $505.00 appellate
filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of
Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24.
2
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the Prisoner Complaint (ECF No. 1) and the action are
dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rules 8 and 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure for the failure of Plaintiff, Donnell Barrow, within the time allowed to file an
amended Prisoner Complaint as directed on the proper, Court-approved form that sued
the proper parties, alleged the personal participation of each named defendant,
complied with the pleading requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 8, and complied with the
legibility requirements of Rule 10.1 of the Local Rules of Practice for this Court, and for
his failure to prosecute. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is
denied. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that any pending motions are denied as moot.
DATED at Denver, Colorado, this
7th
day of
November
, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/Lewis T. Babcock
LEWIS T. BABCOCK
Senior Judge, United States District Court
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?