Wing v. No Named Respondents
ORDER dismissing this action without prejudice as of 9/26/14 by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 9/30/14. (dkals, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-02525-BNB
ROBERT JAMES WING,
[NO RESPONDENT NAMED],
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
Applicant, Robert James Wing, is a prisoner in the custody of the Colorado
Department of Corrections. The instant action was commenced when Mr. Wing
submitted to the Court pro se a letter (ECF No. 1) complaining that prison officials are
not computing his sentence correctly. On September 11, 2014, Magistrate Judge Boyd
N. Boland entered an order directing Mr. Wing to cure certain deficiencies if he wished
to pursue any claims in this action. On September 18, 2014, Mr. Wing submitted to the
Court another letter (ECF No. 4) seeking clarification of the order directing him to cure
deficiencies because he did not believe he needed to do anything. On September 19,
2014, Magistrate Judge Boland entered a minute order explaining that Mr. Wing must
cure the specified deficiencies if he wishes to pursue any claims in this action.
Mr. Wing has not cured the deficiencies as directed. Instead, on September 26,
2014, he submitted another letter (ECF No. 6) stating he does not intend to pursue any
claims in this action. The Court construes the letter filed on September 26 as a notice
of voluntary dismissal.
Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Mr. Wing
“may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the
opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” No
response has been filed by any opposing party in this action. A voluntary dismissal
pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A) is effective immediately upon the filing of a written notice of
dismissal, and no subsequent court order is necessary. See J. Moore, Moore’s Federal
Practice ¶ 41.02(2) (2d ed. 1995); Hyde Constr. Co. v. Koehring Co., 388 F.2d 501, 507
(10th Cir. 1968). The notice closes the file. See Hyde Constr. Co., 388 F.2d at 507.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the instant action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to the
letter (ECF No. 6) that the Court construes as a notice of voluntary dismissal. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the voluntary dismissal is effective as of September
26, 2014, the date the notice of voluntary dismissal was filed in this action.
DATED at Denver, Colorado, this
BY THE COURT:
s/Lewis T. Babcock
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?