Hulse et al v. Adams County, Colorado et al

Filing 45

ORDER denying as moot 12 Motion to Dismiss. The 36 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge is notaccepted because it is also moot. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 06/01/2015. (athom, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Raymond P. Moore
Civil Action No. 14-cv-02531-RM-NYW
JEFFREY HULSE, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ADAMS COUNTY, COLORADO, et al.,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER ON:
(1) RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (ECF NO. 36);
AND
(2) DEFENDANTS’ PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 12)
______________________________________________________________________________
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge (the “Recommendation”) (ECF No. 36) recommending Defendants’ Partial Motion to
Dismiss (the “Motion”) (ECF No. 12) be granted.

No objections to the Recommendation have

been filed, although Plaintiffs sought and received an extension of time to do so. The time for
any objections has passed. Regardless, after the Recommendation was issued, Defendants were
granted leave to file an Amended Complaint and did so recently.

(ECF No. 44). Upon

consideration of these facts and circumstances, the court file, and being otherwise fully advised,
the Court finds the Motion and Recommendation are moot.

It is therefore ORDERED

(1) That Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12) is DENIED AS MOOT;
and

(2) That the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 36) is not
accepted because it is also MOOT.
DATED this 1st day of June, 2015.
BY THE COURT:

____________________________________
RAYMOND P. MOORE
United States District Judge

2