Padilla v. ACS Group

Filing 9

WITHDRAWN: ORDER granting service by United States Marshal, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 11/4/2014. (tscha, ) Modified on 11/4/2014 to withdraw pursuant to Court Order dated 11/4/14. (nmarb, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-02556-RBJ-CBS SARAH PADILLA, Plaintiff, v. ACS GROUP and Doe 1-5, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING SERVICE BY UNITED STATES MARSHAL ______________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer This civil action comes before the court for personal service of the Complaint (Doc. # 1) on Defendant ACS Group. Ms. Padilla is proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (See November 4, 2014 “Order Granting Plaintiff Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915” (Doc. # 8)). Upon information and belief, Defendant ACS Group maintains a principal place of business at 3840 E. Robinson Rd. #165 in Amherst, New York. (See Complaint (Doc. #1) at ¶ 3). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court, where appropriate, shall attempt to obtain a waiver of service from ACS Group, as identified above. If a waiver of service cannot be obtained by the Clerk, the United States Marshal shall serve a copy of the Complaint (Doc. # 1) and summons (Doc. # 3) upon Defendant ACS Group. Where appropriate, the Marshal shall first attempt to obtain a waiver of service pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. It is FURTHER ORDERED that after service of process, ACS Group shall respond to the Complaint as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1 DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 4th day of November, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/ Craig B. Shaffer United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?