Phelps Oil and Gas, LLC v. Noble Energy, Inc. et al
Filing
46
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Telephonic Motion Hearing held on 4/2/2015. Denying 41 Motion to Vacate. Denying 42 Motion to Expedite. FTR: Courtroom A-402. (amont)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer
Civil Action: 14‐cv‐02604‐REB‐CBS
Date: April 2, 2015
Courtroom Deputy: Amanda Montoya
FTR – Reporter Deck‐Courtroom A402
Parties:
Counsel:
PHELPS OIL AND GAS, LLC,
George Barton
Plaintiff,
v.
NOBLE ENERGY INC, et al.,
Michael Gallagher
Lucy Deakins
Daniel McClure
Defendant.
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER
HEARING: TELEPHONIC MOTION HEARING
Court in session: 09:59 a.m.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
This hearing comes before the court in regards to Plaintiff’s MOTION [41] to Vacate the
Magistrate Judge’s Order Setting a Hearing on Motion to Amend, Motion to Dismiss, and
Motion to Stay Deadlines and Settings (Dk. 40) and Plaintiff’s MOTION [42] for an Expedited
Briefing Schedule and for Expedited Consideration of Its Motion to Vacate the Magistrate
Judge’s Order Setting a Hearing on Motion to Amend, Motion to Dismiss, and Motion to Stay
Deadlines and Settings (Dk. 40).
ORDERED: Plaintiff’s MOTION [41] to Vacate the Magistrate Judge’s Order Setting a Hearing
on Motion to Amend, Motion to Dismiss, and Motion to Stay Deadlines and
Settings (Dk. 40) is DENIED. Plaintiff’s MOTION [42] for an Expedited Briefing
Schedule and for Expedited Consideration of Its Motion to Vacate the Magistrate
Judge’s Order Setting a Hearing on Motion to Amend, Motion to Dismiss, and
Motion to Stay Deadlines and Settings (Dk. 40) is DENIED.
HEARING CONCLUDED.
Court in recess: 10:12 a.m. Total time in court: 00:13
To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at
(303) 825‐6119 or toll free at 1‐800‐962‐3345.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?